6 thoughts on “Declassify or not . . .that’s our question.

  1. With tomorrow marking the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President Kennedy, please prioritize release of the remaining secret files and redacted information about this tragic event.

    1. I agree with Dan, declassifying the remaining JFK records should be a priority. Also important are records that would shed light on the assassinations of RFK, MLK and Malcom X. And, all records pertaining directly to the 9/11 attacks, and indirectly, such as pre-9/11 foreign and domestic policy and deliberations concerning terrorism.

  2. Please release the 28 redacted pages from the Joint Congressional Inquiry into the 9/11 attacks, and all documents from the 9/11 Commission (including the redactions of those documents already released… MFRs, etc…)

  3. I am curious why the focus is on declassifying material younger than 25 years old, when so much material older than 25 years is still classified and probably have far less adverse on impact on national security. I would personally like to see all the records of the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) 1948-1952 declassified.

  4. In order to conduct a successful operation to a successful outcome you need well-paid happy people. Raise declass positions to GS 7-12 and hire more people so the ambitious goals can actually be met.

  5. The efforts of the Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB) to transform the security classification system and seek input from the public on what should be prioritized for declassification is a commendable step towards greater transparency in government. By actively engaging citizens in the discussion and seeking their input, the PIDB is working towards a system that is more reflective of the needs and interests of the public.

    The categorization of topics into five categories, based on their age, relevance and source, is a pragmatic approach that ensures a comprehensive review of the classified information. This approach will enable the PIDB to better assess which information should be declassified first, and which should remain classified for security reasons.

    The public’s involvement in the process is critical as it ensures that the declassification process reflects the needs of society. This initiative will also facilitate the identification of previously unknown information, which may have a significant impact on historical events, policy decisions and individual lives.

    In summary, this initiative is a significant step towards greater transparency and accountability in government. By seeking the public’s input and prioritizing declassification efforts based on the relevance and impact of information, the PIDB is laying the foundation for a more open and informed society.

Leave a Reply to Dan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *